
Boston.com – At this time last year, Tedy Bruschi was a primary leader on the Patriots defense. This week, in an indirect way, he may have passed those duties along to Jerod Mayo, the second-year middle linebacker. On Monday as an ESPN analyst, Bruschi criticized Bill Belichick’s decision to go for it on fourth and 2 from his own 28 because, as a former defensive player, it would have irritated him. Speaking to reporters today, Mayo offered the strongest rebuke yet a Patriots player of the sentiment Bruschi, more than anyone, championed. “We looked at it as a challenge,” Mayo said. “People say that it was a lack of confidence in us but we looked at it as a challenge and we looked at it as coach having enough confidence in us to give us a short field. Unfortunately we were unable to step up to the challenge and get the job done.” When asked directly about Bruschi’s comments, Mayo was deferential to his former teammate but did not back down from challenging him. “I have the ultimate respect for Tedy and everything he’s done for this organization, but he’s not in this locker room at this point in time so he doesn’t know the feeling that this defense or this team has. We still have our confidence, we still have our swagger and we’re gonna go out Sunday and show the media I guess.”
When sociologist Robert K. Merton published his landmark paper “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action”, he popularized what we now commonly call The Law of Unintended Consequence. Typically we associate this theory with the negative effects of well intentioned social engineering. The Treaty of Versailles was meant to stick it to the Germans, and it did. To the point where they elected an insane, one-testicled Austrian wallpaper hanger who almost destroyed the world. Starving babies are a bad thing, so we give poor people with babies money which is good for them. So they have lots and lots of poor hungry babies, which is bad for us. But sometimes the unintended consequences are not negative. Sometimes they result in what has been called “serendipity” or “windfall” by the People in Charge of Calling Things Something. Some of our greatest inventions were discovered accidentally by people looking for something else, among them Teflon, Silly Putty, birth control pills and America.
Leave it to Bill Belichick to come up with a serendipitous unintended consequence of the 4th Downgate decision. In this case, the emergence of Jerod Mayo as supreme leader of the Pats defense. Granted, Mayo has been the defacto, on field leader since the moment last year when Belichick took the green dot off Mike Vrabel’s helmet and stuck it to the back of then-rookie Mayo’s. But this is the first example we have of him feeling comfortable enough to step up in front of the microphones, speak on behalf of his entire unit, and tell someone to go piss up a rope. In this case, the media in general and his former captain Tedy Bruschi in particular. Under any other circumstances, I’d go after anyone who had the temerity to call out Tedy, but in this case, I love it. Clearly, Mayo was paying attention last year because he learned from the best. And by “best” I mean Tedy himself. This is exactly the way Bruschi would’ve handled it if one of his former teammates, say, Ted Johnson, ripped a Belichick decision on TV and spoke for the Pats defense. He would’ve paid all due respect, then respectfully told the world no one speaks for his defense but him. Brilliant. It’s still killing me that the Pats lost the spot, the 1st down, the game and probably any chance at a bye in the playoffs. But they might have gained a great deal more.